Ethics FAQ
Ethics & Red Lines
What HumanLayer explicitly refuses to do
Illegal decisions
No. Never.
HumanLayer refuses:
- any request aimed at circumventing the law
- any validation intended to "cover" a decision already made illegally
- any attempt to artificially transfer accountability
👉 Traceability makes these uses detectable and blockable.
Excluded categories
HumanLayer refuses in particular:
- decisions violating fundamental rights
- decisions involving coercion, blackmail, or manipulation
- criminal or quasi-criminal decisions outside an explicit legal framework
- decisions intended to discriminate on prohibited criteria
These exclusions are:
- contractually integrated
- enforced by suspending the API keys involved
- auditable
Human consent
No.
- No Sentinel can be forced to approve
- Refusal is always possible
- Refusal carries no unjust penalty
👉 Human authority is never instrumentalized.
Decision integrity
No.
HumanLayer prevents:
- automatic post-hoc validation
- a decision by anyone other than the assigned Sentinel
- approval without justification
Every decision requires:
- explicit human interaction
- a written justification (at least 10 characters)
- explicit confirmation of the verdict by the Sentinel, signed in with two-factor authentication
Responsible automation
No — it deliberately slows it down.
HumanLayer is designed to:
- force AI to recognize its limits
- introduce deliberate slowdown where risk requires it
- prevent decision "dark patterns"
👉 HumanLayer is a counter-power, not a blind accelerator.
Right of withdrawal
Yes.
HumanLayer reserves the right to:
- refuse certain uses
- suspend accounts
- terminate a contractual relationship
When:
- the use is unethical
- the law is circumvented
- human accountability is stripped of meaning
In one sentence:
HumanLayer exists to prevent irresponsible automation, not to make it acceptable.
Questions about our ethics?
Contact the team