Regulators
How HumanLayer fits into existing frameworks
Regulatory compliance
HumanLayer is designed to be compatible with:
- human accountability requirements
- traceability obligations
- separation of duties principles
- audit and justification requirements
It does not replace regulatory obligations:
👉 it makes them applicable in the AI era.
AI Act (EU)
HumanLayer is aligned with key principles:
- effective human oversight
- transparency
- traceability
- clear accountability
It provides:
- real human oversight (not cosmetic)
- audit-ready evidence
- clear decision attribution
No.
HumanLayer:
- does not make automated decisions
- does not issue final recommendations
- does not exercise autonomous judgment
👉 It is a human orchestration infrastructure, not a decision engine.
Supporting regulators
It allows precise answers to:
- "Who decided?"
- "On what basis?"
- "With what information?"
- "At what time?"
👉 Without post-hoc reconstruction.
Audit
Yes.
HumanLayer can provide:
- decision exports
- access logs
- governance rules
- routing and escalation rules applied
Terms are defined contractually with clients.
Multiple jurisdictions
HumanLayer:
- records the jurisdiction you state in each request (
jurisdictionfield) - then only assigns it to a Sentinel who declared that jurisdiction; otherwise the request waits rather than going outside the jurisdiction
- applies no jurisdiction filter if you don’t state one
👉 Always state the jurisdiction when the legal framework requires it.
In one sentence:
HumanLayer does not create a regulatory gray zone.
It clarifies those that AI makes inevitable.
Questions about compliance?
Contact the team